There's recently been a little bit of controversy in the Cincinnati area, over a billboard of all things. You might wonder if it's the WB or CW (or whatever the trashy teenager TV station is in your area) fanning the flames of suburban discontent by posting sexually explicit images of their latest barely legal teen drama rife with sex, lies and booze. That's usually the offender around here anyway. Show a little too much skin on a billboard or commercial, and somebody's bound to get twisted up about it. But no, the WB wasn't the perpetrator this time. It was this:
Now, I don't know about you, but I'm scratching my head on this one. I know inflammatory when I see it, and there's nothing patently offensive about this billboard. The Coalition of Reason, a national organization with an affiliate in Cincinnati, said this is the first time this has ever happened to them in the United States (removal of ad space due to threats). Way to go, Ohio. Always a bastion of progressive ideals and tolerance, aren't we?
See, here's my problem. I drive all over the interstates of Ohio to visit family and friends. For the past few years, each of my trips throughout Buckeye land have been in the company of some awesome billboards dotting the farmlands of the Midwest. There's the one with the Ten Commandments. There's the one with the aborted baby on it, a surefire way to get me to reconsider my position on abortion. There's the notorious Big Butter Jesus on I-75, from a church who apparently missed the section of the bible about graven images and idols. There's the billboard screaming at me, "If you died today, would you spend eternity in HELL?" The word "HELL" is adorned by some nifty artwork flames.
My point is, I'm surrounded every where I go by people's expressions of faith. They run the gamut from a simple cross adorning someone's front yard, to the cheesy, glaring jumbo-tron messages at mega-churches on the side of the road. While I find much of these expressions silly and at times even ignorant, it never occurred to me to demand that these monuments to someone's faith be removed because I don't agree with the underlying philosophies. It certainly has never occurred to me to threaten someone to remove their personal expressions of faith. I believe strongly that everyone has a right express how they feel, which isn't always an easy stance to stomach when you tend to be in a minority demographic for, well, most things. Especially religion. So why is it that I, a person without faith or religion, can exercise civility and tolerance in the face of diverging worldviews (and pictures of aborted fetuses and reminders that I'm going to hell)...but those under the tutelage of religions espousing those very ideals cannot? Curious. Very curious.
If you visit the Cincinnati Coalition of Reason's website, their mission is pretty simple. They are a group of nontheistic individuals working to increase awareness and tolerance of secular-minded principles. And campaigns such as the billboard above are intended to reach out to the (at last count) 15% of Americans who claim no affiliation to religion or belief in God. It is intended to help these individuals know that they are not alone, and they are not pariahs in their communities. That they can come together, and share ideas. Can I think of a reason people might find that offensive? Hmm. I can think of a few, ones that are altogether antithetical to the messages many religions claim to espouse.
Isn't it interesting how so many religions, and subsequently splintered denominations of those religions, are birthed from oppression and persecution...and yet, ultimately so many of them go on to repeat the sins of their predecessors?
And in any event, apparently someone has not learned the most important lesson of all here. In drawing more attention to something, you simply give it more power. Which is how I came to find and connect with the Coalition of Reason in the first place. So, I guess if anything, I actually owe somebody a thank you.
This book gave me a better feel for Murakami. In the future if someone asks which book to start with I'll recommend this one.
As in Kafka on the Shore I had a really hard time believing in the characters (they all feel like the same person to me) and caring for them (they feel two-dimensional).
The part that really didn't work was Murakami, a man, writing about female sexual experiences. It just didn't ring true at all. Just one example: two women had sex with one particular man and it was so good they swore off sex for the rest of their lives.
But, as in the previous book, I did appreciate the overarching story. What would it be like to continually know people close to you committing suicide? Or to continually be involved in three-way friendships?
My big girl had her first real trick-or-treat tonight.
She LOVED it. It was hard to peel her off the sidewalk when her little nose became red and chapped and it was time to bundle her up and bring her home. She thought she was the coolest thing ever, strolling from driveway to driveway, holding up her mini pumpkin bag and speaking gibberish for "trick or treat!" She had a BIG "HI!" for every person she passed and wanted to show off the contents of her Halloween goodie bag for them.
She is a busy, busy girl, and she really wears me out sometimes, but boy is life fun with a little one around. I live for days like these :)
Six in all, the pieces are a mix of essays and short stories. The short stories include baby murder and intentional self-dismemberment.
The essays are not quite as disturbing, but still not what I would call funny. Even Santaland, which is one of the author's most famous pieces, was never one of my favorites. But most people find that one fall down funny. I don't get it.
Maybe I don't get it because I can't join the Christmas -is-the-most-depressing-time-of-year mentality. I mean, it's not like my favorite time of year, but I think we've all become a little too dramatic about how depressing we think the holidays are.
I'm starting to think I'm a freak just because I can accept the holidays as another day, and I don't spend the rest of the year either dreading them, plotting against them, or harassing people who say Happy Holidays as opposed to Merry Christmas. Times are weird.
I picked this one up because pretty much everyone who reads it says they hate it and if I haven't read an author I like to start out with the one people seem to anecdotally hate the most.
Although I have no interest in fishing, I did enjoy this book. I came away learning some things about fishing as well as a few tidbits of wisdom.
And the book was either not as over-the-top macho as I was expecting, or I've become impervious and need to find more girlfriends.
Even if I had hated this book and David Sedaris, I would have read this one for its cover.
I know there are those who would say that's wrong, but I don't care. I just don't care.
My favorite essay was You Can't Kill the Rooster.
I'm going out and making one of those today!
*Although it is hard for me to make such a painfully personal post public, I'm going to do so, because I feel so strongly about this issue, that I want to share this with anyone who would like to read it.
Hi, my name is Prairie, and I'm a recipient of socialized medicine.
Gasp! It's such a dirty word, socialized. It means that dastardly inept behemoth known as the federal government makes life and death decisions about my care. It clearly means I must wait in long lines, and be denied access for lack of resources. I might even die before I receive life-critical care. And in the case that I'm in one of those life or death situations, it looks like a death panel might make that fateful decision whether I live or die.
Right?
Um, not so much. I *love* the rhetoric going around about so-called socialized medicine from completely uneducated sources who have never experienced this care themselves. Except of course for the Senators and House members blustering and frothing at the mouth over the injustice of government-run and paid for care...who receive taxpayer subsidized care themselves. I can't be the only one who finds the hypocrisy hilarious.
*Ahem* Anyway. Let me tell you a little bit about government run care, since I actually know what I'm talking about. Husband and I receive all of our care at a Military Treatment Facility (MTF), a giant hospital that houses primary care, acute care, emergency care, optical, dental, surgical, cosmetic, dermatological, prenatal and labor and delivery care, and an in-house lab and pharmacy as well. Each time I need something, anything, I call the appointment line and say "I need an eye exam," or "I need to sign up for the birthing class on-base" or "I have a 102 degree fever...where do I go?" and so on. I am routed to the clinic that deals with my need, and I make an appointment. So let me tell you the kind of care husband and I and our children have received there, and what it cost us.
At the age of 7, our first child was diagnosed with Ewing's Sarcoma. After a CT scan revealed a mass on her kidney, the base referred us out to the the Children's Medical Center in the area for the highly specialized care they could offer for pediatric cancer. She had two surgeries, and subsequently spent eight months in chemotherapy and radiation for cancer. She was on weekly fluid packs that pumped drugs and fluids through her body, as well as about 10 prescriptions weekly. She had in-home nurse care to maintain her broviac catheter, a catheter that was placed in her chest, and protruded from the skin around the area of her heart for easy medicine injection. We were given all medical supplies to take care of her broviac site at home by ourselves. In fact, they gave duplicates of everything to two homes, since she lived with both her mother and us during that time. This included drugs, syringes, dressing change kits, medical gauze by the pound, even alcohol swabs. Her in-hospital meals were even provided. After remission, she was provided with monthly CT scans, and quarterly PET scans, as well as tri-monthly bloodwork to monitor her remission. Because we asked for it, the hospital gave us the bills charged to the military healthcare network. To date, her care has been over $600,000 and counting. Our Cost: $0.
After a year of unsuccessfully trying to get pregnant when we were 28, husband and I realized something was probably wrong. I first saw an OB on-base, then a reproductive endocrinologist who began fertility testing on both of us. We underwent extensive testing, after which the endocrinologist determined intra-uterine insemination (IUI) or in-vitro fertilization would be our only option to conceive. He immediately put me on Clomid and HcG injections to begin IUI cycles. As a money saving option, they gave me patient teaching for HcG and taught me to inject myself with the necessary drugs via an 18 gauge needle in my thigh each month. It was a bit frightening at first, but not exactly rocket science. When Clomid didn't work for me, he switched me to Tamoxifen and began giving me Estrogen pills as well. I received ultrasounds to monitor follicle size multiple times each month. I received the IUI procedures on-base, in a small office in the women's health center clinic. On the second cycle, I conceived. I got pregnant! The average cost of IUI for a couple is about $10,000, which is rarely covered by any insurance company. Our Cost: $0.
My prenatal care for baby was on-base. I received all OB care, pregnancy lab work and exams, and prescriptions onsite. I picked up my prenatal vitamins and occasional other scripts at the in-house pharmacy. When I developed severe migraines during my second trimester, I received a MRI scan of my brain, hormone testing and audience with a maternal-fetal medicine doctor to determine treatment. Our Cost: $0.
I delivered baby at the MTF. I had a midwife, OB, and two nurses with me for the entire delivery. I had a nasty fever and infection during birth, and baby was born with signs of the infection. She was treated immediately upon birth. I also received an epidural, and multiple injections during labor to treat the fever and infection. I stayed at the hospital for three days, and they provided meals for both husband and me, and gave me a "Mom's kit" upon exit, with all of the things necessary to heal after birth. Things one would normally have to send husband to the pharmacy to get (pads, cooling foam, witch hazel pads--which I don't mention to share TMI, I mention because these are not typically hospital freebies!). In addition, baby and I were both sent home with antibiotics to treat the delivery infection. Typical cost of a birth in the United States without complications? Around $8,000. Our Cost: $0.
Ten days after baby was born, I started showing signs of infection again. High fevers, chills and general flu-like symptoms. I called my OB, and she sent me to the emergency room. Turns out I had mastitis, and retained birth matter in my uterus, causing a uterine infection. After multiple ultrasounds, I had a D&C and stayed in the hospital for four days. The hospital even issued me a free breast pump during that time so I could continue breastfeeding. Our Cost: $0.
When baby was seven months old, it became apparent that there was something wrong with her neck. She could not lift it to one side, and she had not rolled over from back to belly, nor had she made moves to crawl. She would scream excruciating bloody murder when I put her on her belly. We brought her in to the doc, to find that she had torticollis, a condition in which the neck muscle on one side has not developed properly, and becomes painfully tight. The child can usually not even lift their head to center. She was referred to Children's Medical Center, where she received three months of physical therapy to correct the condition. Our cost: $0.
And so on and so on and so on. You get the idea. I present this not to present a sunshiny image of government run medicine, but to tell you that I get what I need, and I get it in the same way one might in the private sector. The only difference? I have never received a bill, not even a piece of paper upon discharge or at any appointment. I've never made a co-pay. I've never paid for a prescription, even though our script bills between us and two kids has run into the thousands of dollars in one year's time. I had procedures not even considered by private insurance companies....for free.
Do I have complaints? Yep. Because I am not presenting a one-sided biased argument here, I will share a few.
I frequently see residents for primary care. Never for specialized care, however.
I never have to wait for acute or emergent care, but I do have to wait for primary care, unless I am ill or in immediate need. Example? When I called for my yearly eye exam one time, I was told there were no appointments available for thirty days, and I should call back when they opened the calendar for the following month. This is the only time something like this happened.
The prenatal care feels too clinical sometimes. It is not in a quiet doctor's office...it is in a clinic.
I am assigned to a team for routine or primary care, meaning I can't always get in to see my PCM, or my OB, and I might have to see one of their numerous partners.
Most of my complaints about my care revolve around the fact that the care has become less convenient for me. I sometimes have to wait in the lab to get bloodwork. Sometimes the doc has not turned in my prescription to the pharmacy and I have to wait even longer while they'll call her and track down the script. I sometimes have to argue for a referral to the private sector for specialized care. Parking sucks. With retirees, active duty and dependents served by the same facility, the patients seen at this facility number in the tens of thousands. I am especially prone to complaining when I am pregnant and forced to park in a desolate corner of the hospital lot.
I believe every petty gripe I have here is pretty common in the private sector as well. It's important for me to note that most of my complaints are tied up in the fact the this is a military facility that has been decimated by deployment of doctors, nurses and techs overseas for the war effort, thereby reducing personnel at home. I am certain that a public option would have issues of its own...but here's the bottom line: In our ten years in-service, we've racked up over a million dollars in medical care, due to some unforeseen, and nearly catastrophic medical issues in our family. And we haven't paid a dime. We are not bankrupt or drowning in medical bills, and we have NEVER BEEN DENIED care for anything. And I'm still alive. A little inconvenienced at times, but alive and healthy. And I have two children, ONLY because the government paid for the treatment of one, and the conception of the other. And for that, I am eternally grateful for my public option. And eternally humble because I got it, while others did not and continued to be denied. It doesn't seem right, does it?
I'll let the government decide my care options any day over a for-profit, soulless insurance company.
So I have mixed feelings about the new show Community. Not surprisingly, this is probably related to the fact that I work at a community college. I cringed a little when I saw the initial commercials for the pilot because I knew that the gist of the show was going to be brutal mockery of the community college climate. Now, I'm not one who is too sensitive to laugh at the comic vulnerability of groups I belong to. There's a lot of humor to be found in marriage, the military, parenthood, my working class background, and various other aspects of my makeup. And yes, in any college there is ample humor to be found, as some of my past blog posts will evidence.
I wanted to like you, Community. On top of the fact that I am big fan ofJoel McHale and John Oliver (anything associated with the Daily Show = good in my book) , I am craving a cure for the ailing, ridiculous excuse that is the sitcom in modern America. The cheap laugh tracks, the tired, played out jokes about marital life or the single life or parenting or, or, or...I am bored to TEARS with primetime television. I was hoping desperately for another 30 Rock or Arrested Development to break up the drivel of weeknight comedy.
Alas, I'm disappointed. On top of the fact that the writing is lukewarm, I felt some of the jokes are a little, well, mean-spirited. About life at a community college. About the student body. About the quality of the education. I couldn't help feel a little put off by the opener to last night's show: "Higher Learning. Lower Standards. Community." They refer to the college as a "toilet shaped like a school." There are students urinating in the bushes outside a faculty member's office. The student personas are all grossly exaggerated--insulting stereotypes of single, saucy black moms; the neurotic, perky do-gooder; the befuddled, sexual-harassing geriatric; or the washed-up high school athlete still trying to relive his football glory days. Come on guys. Can't we do better than that? I mean they've made every person who attends the school on the show a complete idiot...except of course for Jeff Winger (Joel McHale) who is super cool in his disdain of his surroundings. I wasn't just put off because a two-year college was referred to as a toilet, I was a little offended on behalf of the people who start their academic journey at a two-year college. The laughs at their expense seem a little cheap. Are we supposed to believe that students at a four-year or private college are somehow better, somehow don't suffer from the totally realistic life circumstances (single parenting, going back to school later in life) that provide such cheap fodder on this show?
So, Community, let me set the record straight for you. Let me tell you a few things about community college. While there are typical student antics, student antics are funny when they are funny, not because you make blatant and overwrought generalizations about vulnerable populations that attend two-year college. Making fun of the quality or place of education can only be funny if it's based on realistic humorous aspects of education, not you pretending like kids pissing outside an office window is an every day school occurrence and knee-slapping funny.
Here's something else: the local community college is the only place that marginalized, non-college-prepared students might find a home. A home that makes the difference between unemployment/burger flipping job prospects for the rest of their life, and a meaningful trade or profession where they contribute to the community, their families and the lives of their children. It is the place where the single mom (but not the idiot single mom of Community who bakes brownies for a crackpot protest she doesn't understand) can attend online or at night, so that she might teach her own children that college and a better life is within reach. It is the difference between being saddled with $100,000 in college debt, or half that because you started your college career at a place where the curriculum standards are exactly the same as any other institution, but half the price. It is the place (often the only place) where fundamental reading and writing (of the grammar school variety) are taught, so that the student who can't read or write beyond a fourth grade level might gain the skills sorely lacking from an appalling public school education and go on to succeed at the college level. It is a soft place to land for students lacking skill, confidence, money, the belief that college is right for them, or even the time to go to college until they are well into their 30s or beyond. It is the true definition of community: any and all are welcome here, with the goal of access to education for all.
I'm really not a soapbox here, I swear. I'm not offended by the concept of the show per se, just the low-blow humor at the expense of people like those I deal with every day. When I think of the absolutely heartbreaking stories I've heard in my years here, and the pride those students take in saying I'm finally in college! I feel a little defensive on their behalf. I would hate to think of any of my students watching this show and feeling bruised or embarrassed to be associated with an education like theirs or worse, that the idiots on the show are somehow representative of them and their fellow students.
So, don't be surprised if, in spite of my high hopes....I'm not exactly rooting for Community to succeed. At the very least, I submit to the writers--do your homework a little better. Make it funny, not mean.
Once upon a time, a man died and went up to Heaven, where Saint Peter was waiting for him at the Holy Gates.
“I’m very sorry,” said Saint Pete, “but I can’t let you in.”
The man was shocked and very disappointed. “Why not, Saint Peter?” he asked. “Wasn’t I a good man on Earth?”
“You were a very good man, indeed,” replied Saint Pete.“But here’s what your problem was – you could not stop yourself from telling other people how to lead their lives. If they were making a mistake of some kind, you felt compelled to point it out to them.”
Once again, the man was shocked by Saint Peter’s words. “But I don’t understand, Saint Peter. Why was this a bad thing? I was just trying to help them. Isn’t that what we’re supposed to do on Earth - help people?”
“Not in this instance,” replied Saint Peter sternly. “You never learned to mind your own business. And for that reason, I’m afraid you’ll have to go to Hell.”
The man pleaded with Saint Pete. “Please, Saint Peter, I didn’t mean any harm. I was just trying to help, that’s all. I didn’t know I was doing a bad thing. Please, please, give me another chance?”
Saint Peter looked at the man and could see that he honestly hadn’t meant any harm. Because that was so, he thought that perhaps he might bend the rules…just this once. However, before he did, he would test the man’s sincerity. Unbeknownst to the man, of course.
“All right,” decided Saint Pete. “I’ll go to the Higher Ups and see what I can do. In the meantime, you wait in that room over there. Just go in, and close the door behind you.”
The room to which the man had been directed was large and empty, save for a bench. As directed, he closed the door as he went in, and sat on the bench, waiting for his verdict. And as he sat, he noticed there was a narrow, open archway which led to an anteroom at the far side, opposite to where he was sitting.
As he was pondering what might be in the anteroom, the door he’d closed opened, and an angel came in. He was carrying a very tall ladder.
“Hello,” said the angel. “I hope I’m not disturbing you. Do you mind if I come through? I’ve just got to take this ladder and leave it in that anteroom over there.”
“Please, go right ahead,” said the man. “You don’t need my permission.”
And then, an odd thing happened. The man watched as the angel walked across the room towards the anteroom, turned his ladder horizontally in his arms, and attempted to walk through the narrow archway with it. Naturally, he was unable to get through, as the ladder held horizontally was now much too wide.
The man observed with incredulity as the angel made attempt after attempt to get through the archway while holding the ladder thusly. Each time, the ends of the ladder banged against the wall on either side of the opening, propelling the angel backwards, and making quite a mess of the walls it kept hitting, in the process.
Naturally, after about fifteen minutes of this, the angel was winded and perspiring.
“Whew!” he exclaimed. “I didn’t realize this was going to be so difficult.”
The man couldn’t believe what he was hearing. “Are you serious?” he blurted. “If you want to get through, hold the damn ladder vertically!”
The angel shook his head and looked at the man regretfully. “My friend," he said, “this ladder’s not damned, but you are.”
And the next thing the man knew, he was in Hell.
_______________________
I can’t remember how old I was when my father told
me the story above, but I was still young enough that
my questions were only just starting to become
annoying to him. Those questions were on every
subject from “Why do you support the war in Vietnam?”
to “Why don’t you ever do anything to stop all the
terrible things going on in this house?”
Since he couldn’t seem to come up with any reasonable
answers for me, the parable above was an attempt to
stave off the inevitable, which was that my
questioning of him would eventually go
from annoying to unbearable… for both of us.
Even my response to this story was not what he’d
hoped. He thought I’d feel forewarned that my quixotic
nature was taking me closer to Hades every day. But
ironically, all it prompted was another litany of
questions: “What kind of angel is stupid enough to
behave like a human?” and “What kind of God would
send a man to Hell for questioning human stupidity?”
It wasn’t until many, many years later that I recognized
that my father had a point, though perhaps not in the
way he’d believed. Anyone at all, with an average
human intelligence, understands very well which
way one needs to hold a ladder in order to get it
through a narrow archway. But pretending that he
doesn’t, he accomplishes one thing – he can tell himself
he tried to get through with everything he had and
just couldn’t succeed.
The fact is, he doesn’t want to succeed. He says
he has to get through a door and deposit a ladder in
an anteroom, but he doesn’t truly want to.
He just wants to pretend to himself and everyone
else, that he really, really tried.
And because this is actually what he wants – that
illusion of the attempt of a completion of a 'task', which is
another word for a ‘change’ – rather than the actual
change – he doesn’t want anyone to point out to him
that his ‘attempt’ is in actuality no attempt at all.
He doesn’t need anyone getting in the way of
his self-deception. Like my father, it will more
than irritate him, because by pointing it out, making him aware that you are aware that he’s lying to himself, you will make him hate himself and, as a result, (especially if your own attempts at change are real, and your desire to help him is motivated out of genuine caring, rather than smug superiority) – he will hate you, too.
A fast way to hell, indeed.
Remember that the next time you
(metaphorically) observe an intelligent adult holding a ladder horizontally, trying to get through an archway.
Say nothing. Wish him “good luck,” and get out of his way.
---------------------
I'm sorry I can't answer comments here. They are not possible to answer due to a software glitch on my page, which has now even begun to affect the appearance of my blogs. It's degenerative, I swear.And very irritating.
If you'd like to leave me a message, please visit patriciavolonakisdavis.wordpress.com. Thank you very much.
Kzinti and Baria - thank you for your comments over at my wordpress blog. They meant a lot. I miss you.
The book came up in conversation and the book was lent to me. I even put other things on hold to read this one.
So why was it so fascinating to me? I think because I grew up in a very male household: grandfather, father, and two brothers. One of my earliest memories are watching sports with my grandfather and playing sports with my brothers. Give me a room full of guys talking about last night's game, and I'll still feel at home--even if I don't follow sports myself anymore.
Back to the point, not once as a kid did we ever talk about umpires. And I just realized how strange that was. I realized I knew nothing about the topic of umpires.
But a few dozen pages into the book I started asking myself: "Why would anyone want to be an umpire?" It's a job where you are always on the outskirts or you're invisible; you never belong. The most you can ask for is silence. People not yelling at you is a good day.
I never really did answer that question. I suppose like all things there are people out there who love it. They would do it whether or not they get paid. They just love doing it. And really, you should do what you love, no matter what.
Oh, and the author of this book wrote the most poetic thing about sports I have ever read. Here it is: "The umpires…are neither inside the game as the players are, nor outside it among the fans, but the game passes through you, like rainwater through a filter, and that your job is to influence it for the better, to strain out the impurities to make it cleaner, fairer, and more transparent, without impeding it, corrupting it, changing its course, or making it taste funny."